3 Comments

  1. No Voice No Vote

    Hey David,

    I ran across this video about population rates world-wide shrinking, except Islamic’s. It says, “As a population SHRINKS, so does the Culture.”

    I’ve been concerned about the low population growth in my Tribe for some time now. I am not a mathmatician, I don’t know how to calculate population growth rates. I just know that our Tribe is not growing, hardly at all. I don’t know why, or if other Tribe’s growth rates are similar to ours.

    In 1982, the best I can find, we had a population of 792. Last year, I found a document online that our Chairman signed that stated we have a population of 1581. Add another 10 or so for new births and we have around 1592 now.

    1592 So, we grew by ~800 members from 1982 to 2017. What rate of growth is that? This video *-792* says: “In order for any Nation to sustain itself for more than 25 years it must sustain a 800 Fertility rate of 2.11.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrA_9SoCitk

    Can you help me out with this? Dawn

    On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 1:56 PM, NDNHISTORYRESEARCH | Critical & Indigenous Anthropology wrote:

    > David G. Lewis’ Ethnohistory Research, LLC posted: ” The Kalapuyan tribes > were about 19 tribes and bands in the Willamette Valley. The tribes and > bands in the Tualatin valley were the Tualatin Kalapuyans. Historical > documents also called these people Twalaty or Atfalati. Many Tualatin ” >

    • Its standard population studies. Basically if we replace ourselves each generation the culture can continue. The .11 is likely the rate of child death before they have children. But you would need to study and get numbers for how much of your growth is new births. Much of your growth could be people becoming members later in life as the tribe restore themselves. We are all still in a restoration mode, as we are restoring governance and control over our territories within this new colonial power, the United States. The problem with tribes though is not all tribal members are Cultural, living in a cultural lifestyle, so unless there is a social education campaign that is getting everyone involved in the culture, your growth may be illusionary. You are growing people, but can the original culture, even what exists today survive when your people are scattered so broad that there is no centralized culture? this is a question to ask. What is the culture is another question? not all members will agree as to what that is. Tribal studies in this regard are very rare. I could refer your to some scholars who may be able to help if you want more hard statistics. The key for our tribes is for the tribe to not just grow population but also have a broad social education campaign, that has to happen. Unless your tribe is just going to let the chips fall where they may and take a laize faire approach. There are probably segments of the tribe who want to be cultural and will work to live in that way, but right now most tribes are becoming less tribal and less cultural and people are assimilating to American culture. With blood quantum requirements in most tribes we are seeing a net loss of the original tribal families as people move away and marry outside of the tribe and thin the native quantum of the blood (Blood-quantum is an illusionary concept that really does not exist except in our imagination). In a sense tribes are self-terminating, because eventually there will be less people in the tribe. In population progression studies the out-marriage alone will cause all tribes to be half the size they are or less in 100 years. I hope this addresses some of your questions.

  2. […] “The Kalapuyans lived in the same or similar pattern for a long time, a stable seasonal round of regular planned activities. Bands and families would harvest in the same locations every year, in many cases they claimed ownership over specific oak groves or camas fields, or lakes. Many village locations were inhabited by tribal descendants for thousands of years.” – David G. Lewis […]

Leave a Reply