6 Comments

  1. bdanner18

    Hi Dr. Lewis.
    In the book “The Centennial History of Oregon, 1811 to 1911” by Joseph Gaston (1912) (a free PDF is on Google Books). On page 67 it mentions the “Pee-you” as well as another group. He describes a people called the Lap-tam-bif, saying they “lived on the Mohawk River, Lane County, Oregon.” He also described the Pee-you as just living along the Willamette River with no other descriptions.
    I thought it was interesting because the name Long-tongue-buff came up as another tribe that Alexander Ross described in 1812. These are the two closest sounding names described between the two sources.

    I couldn’t tell what Gaston’s sources are for this statement but I then googled the name “Lap-tam-bif” and came up with another book (Also has a free PDF) “Handbook of American Indians North of Mexico” Edited by Frederick Webb Hodge (1907) and got a small description of the Laptambif (pg. 760): “Probably a band of Calapooya proper. In 1877 the name was borne by “Old Ben,” at Grande Ronde res., Oreg., who came from Mohawk r., Lane co.” Hodge says the name was recorded by an Atfalati Gatschet MS., B. A. E., 368, 1877. (Who I am guessing is the Ethnographer working for the Bureau of American Ethnology in 1877). I searched for “Pee-You” in the same book and the name was mentioned but they didn’t know much about them (pg. 646).

    I did a search for Old Ben on your blog and his name comes up a couple times.

    I hope this is helpful information.

    Thanks,
    Bryce Danner

      • bdanner18

        Sorry for my previously rambling email with no questions (I pressed send and realized I didn’t ask what I wanted to). This question may be more relevant to the article on the Mohawk Reservation.

        I was wondering if Laptambif or Long-tongue-buff was also a Mohawk River tribe?

        After I sent the message yesterday, I saw a Wikipedia article on the Long Tom River suggesting the river may have been named after this group: “The Native American name of this Kalapuyan group is [lámpʰtumpif]”. But when I looked on the Handbook of North American Indians it names two groups the Chemapho, and Chelamela who lived along the Long Tom. So now I am wondering, based on what I found in the previous message, that the Pe-U shared a close territory with the Laptambif and maybe were placed in the same reservation together.

  2. I documented 9 Kalapuyan temporary reservations in the valley, not one was on the Long Tom, the closest maybe was Chemapho TR at Alpine. I don’t have a record for one with the Long Tom or Chelamela people, but that does not mean there was not one. Even closer than the Mohawk TR up in the Mohawk valley was the Chafin TR at the Spores ranch. So it’s an interesting problem, there may have been a Long Tom TR I just don’t have a record yet. I have not taken the time to initiate a search through Lane County HS records, mainly because their policy establishes a steep paywall for any research there.

  3. Note the census table above there is a notation of Long Tom and 16 people- quite a small number- These people may have easily been on a temporary reservation but we do not have a record of that reservation yet. The records for the temporary reservations are very scattered and there is not much information. Only one has a true report, that for the St Helens reservation, with a census, the rest have either no reports, or perhaps one letter asking for help or additional funds. Some of the records may have easily gotten lost, as Palmer was fired in the midst of 1856, after the first removals, and so letters may have gotten lost during the changeover.

Leave a Reply